Category: Blog
-

How to Improve Revision | Diagnose What Faded, Prioritise the Return and Rehearse Future Performance
A practical guide to improving revision by diagnosing what has faded, prioritising high-value weak links, retrieving before rereading, spacing returns, mixing methods, using full papers intelligently and rehearsing the performance that matters.
-

The Tutor Handbook Companion 0136A | The Adaptive-Difficulty Check — Compare Progress When Question Difficulty Changes
Companion to canonical Vol.0136, The Response-Time Interpretation Gate. This page owns comparability when question difficulty changes; it does not own speed or hesitation interpretation.
-

The Tutor Handbook Vol No.0137 | The Task-Choice Evidence Gate — How a Tutor Interprets Learner-Selected Practice Without Letting Choice Turn a Comfortable Set Into False Evidence of Mastery
THB-0137 — How tutors use learner choice for agency and practice without letting self-selected comfortable tasks become false evidence of mastery.
-

The Tutor Handbook Vol No.0136 | The Response-Time Interpretation Gate — How a Tutor Reads Fast and Slow Correct Answers Without Treating Speed as Understanding or Hesitation as Ignorance
THB-0136 — How tutors interpret fast and slow correct answers using task, accuracy, support, familiarity and purpose instead of treating speed as understanding or hesitation as ignorance.
-

The Tutor Handbook Companion 0135A | The Missing-Response Differential — Separate Not Reached, Skipped, Misread, Inaccessible and Unfinished Work
Companion to canonical Vol.0135, The Omission Audit. This page classifies the mechanisms behind missing responses—unreached, skipped, misunderstood, inaccessible, unfinished, or no usable route—before the tutor chooses a repair.
-

The Tutor Handbook Vol No.0135 | The Omission Audit — How a Tutor Decides What an Unanswered Item Means Before Treating Silence, Skips or Blank Work as Evidence of a Knowledge Gap
THB-0135. The Omission Audit shows how tutors interpret unanswered, skipped and not-reached work before treating a blank as evidence of a knowledge gap.